1 A P P E A R A N C E S
2 Mr. Floyd Bartch- Chairman
3 Mr. Jack Gant- Commissioner
4 Ms. Judith Sutter-Hinrichs- Commissioner
5 Mr. Kevin P. Mullally- Executive Director
6 Ms. Angie Franks- Administrative Assistant
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 CHAIRMAN FLOYD BARTCH: Well, I think we're ready
2 to go then. Would you
call the roll?
3 MS. ANGIE FRANKS: Chairman Bartch?
4
CHAIRMAN BARTCH: Present.
5 MS. FRANKS:
Commissioner Hinrichs?
6 COMMISSIONER HINRICHS: Present.
7 MS. FRANKS:
Commissioner Gant?
8
COMMISSIONER GANT: Present.
9 CHAIRMAN BARTCH:
Kevin.
10 MR. KEVIN MULLALLY: Mr. Chairman, good morning,
11 Commissioners. Before
we get into the materials in your
12 book, there's a couple of acknowledgments. I think today
13 is a particularly melancholy day for a lot of people in
14 the state, the passing of Buzz Westfall. He was a great
15 friend to the first director of this Commission, Tom Irwin,
16 who worked with him on a number of issues over the years.
17 And he was a -- I didn't know him as well as some of you
18 did, but he was a very dedicated public servant and will
19 be sorely missed. I
think we should certainly acknowledge
20 that. We might also
mention that a very valued member of
21 our staff is now -- he would probably strangle me for
22 saying this if he were here.
But Ernie Raub is one of the
23 real horses on our staff.
He does a tremendous amount of
24 work as an incredibly dedicated individual, an incredibly
25 talented individual.
He's recovering from surgery, and we
Page 3
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 wish him well, as well.
2 Under Tab A in your book are minutes of the June
3 26 meeting. Then we
also have minutes from August 12.
4 COMMISSIONER JUDITH HINRICHS: I'll move that
5 the minutes be approved from the June 26 meeting.
6 COMMISSIONER JACK GANT: I'll second it.
7 CHAIRMAN BARTCH:
Any others? Can you -- if
8 no, call the roll.
9 MS. FRANKS:
Chairman Bartch?
10 CHAIRMAN BARTCH:
Approved.
11 MS. FRANKS:
Commissioner Hinrichs?
12 COMMISSIONER HINRICHS: Approved.
13 MS.
FRANKS: Commissioner Gant?
14 COMMISSIONER GANT: Approved.
15 MS. FRANKS:
By your vote you've adopted the
16 minutes of the June 26, 2003 meeting.
17
MR. MULLALLY: Mr. Chairman, it's
my
18 understanding that Hearing Officer McCanse is not yet
19 here.
20 MS. FRANKS:
Did we do August 12 minutes?
21 COMMISSIONER HINRICHS: I would move that we
22 approve the August 12 minutes.
23 COMMISSIONER GANT: I'll second.
24 CHAIRMAN BARTCH:
No other discussion? Call
25 the roll.
Page 4
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 MS. FRANKS:
Chairman Bartch?
2
CHAIRMAN BARTCH: Approved.
3 MS. FRANKS:
Commissioner Hinrichs?
4 COMMISSIONER HINRICHS: Approved.
5 MS. FRANKS:
Commissioner Gant?
6 COMMISSIONER
GANT: Approved.
7 MS. FRANKS:
By your vote you've adopted the
8 minutes of the August 12, 2003 meeting.
9 MR. MULLALLY:
Now I think that it's my
10 understanding that Hearing Officer McCanse is not yet
11 here, so if we could move directly into the next agenda
12 item, which is a presentation from the staff regarding our
13 analysis of the St. Louis market. Jim Oberkirsch will
14 come up and join me. He
will be making the bulk of this
15 presentation. This
issue has been before several
16 Commissions for a number of years. We originally began
17 looking at the St. Louis market in 1999, looking at
18 additional capacity in the St. Louis market in 1999. The
19 Harrah's Maryland Heights property at that point had
20 several years to prove itself and establish itself in the
21 market. It appeared
from the relatively rapid growth at
22 that time that there was additional capacity in the St.
23 Louis market, and there was certainly a lot of interest
24 from applicants and various communities in having a casino
25 in their area. We began
that with an 18 month long process
Page 5
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 of having applicants in before the Commission, the staff
2 meeting with applicants, as well as hearing
3 public testimony from both proponents and opponents of the
4 various casino proposals.
And at that time there were a
5 number of them. At the
conclusion of that process in the
6 summer of 2000 the Commission selected a proposal from the
7 Isle of Capri in unincorporated Jefferson County as a
8 prioritization for investigation. As you know, that's the
9 first step in our process towards licensure. It doesn't
10 mean that you'll be licensed.
It just means that we've
11 taken a look at them and it's kind of the, I guess a
12 stalking horse to use a banking term. It's the one at the
13 early stages of the process that we think has the best
14 possibilities to make it through the licensure. During
15 the course of the investigation into that application the
16 Commission discovered that there had been some mistakes
17 made during the presentation.
There had been some
18 misstatements of fact by the applicant. And the
19 Commission chose to in, I believe August of 2001, chose to
20 withdraw that prioritization from Isle of Capri and fine
21 the company for its misconduct during that time period. A
22 couple of times in the interim we have attempted to
23 restart this process, but the relatively fluent membership
24 on the Commission has prevented us from doing so. Now
25 that we have three members that are going to be with us
Page 6
Concannon & Jaeger
St. Louis, Missouri (314)
421-1000
1 for quite some time, we hope, and the govenor's office has
2 assured us that shortly we will have two more, we think
3 it's now appropriate to begin this process.
4 So what we would like to do for you today is have
5 Jim Oberkirsch, who is our financial analyst and really
6 has done a phenomenal job, as did Tom Irwin before. Tom
7 Irwin essentially was the financial analyst before Jim got
8 here. He really served
in that role more
9 than anybody else. I
think if you look at the
10 Commission's track record in managing this market, it is
11 really quite a feat.
There's no community in the state
12 that has a casino that doesn't want one, where there is an
13 overwhelming community support for it, both at the time
14 of licensure and that continues today. And we hear it in
15 their relicensure proceedings.
And for the most part the
16 casinos have been successful, productive members of their
17 community. So -- and I
think that the choices the
18 Commission has made over the years reflect the good work
19 that's been done there.
So with -- we're using the city's
20 equipment, so you'll have to bear with me for a moment.
21 Problem solved.
22 MR. JIM OBERKIRSCH: We ready to go, Kevin?
23 Good morning, Chairman and Commissioners. With the first
24 few slides I'd just like to present some of the dynamics
25 currently affecting the St. Louis market. Give you a
Page 7
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 flavor for some of the casinos currently operating in the
2 market, things like that.
3 There are currently five casinos in the St. Louis
4 market, what we call the St. Louis metropolitan area,
5 which is made up of about nine counties in Missouri and
6 Illinois. There's three
on the Missouri side and two on
7 the Illinois side. The
Missouri casinos are the Ameristar
8 in St. Charles,
Harrah's in Maryland Heights, and the
9 President in downtown St. Louis. They're represented by
10 push pins on the map.
The Illinois casinos are the Casino
11 Queen in East St. Louis, Illinois, just across the river
12 from the Admiral, and the Alton Belle, up north in Alton.
13 You can see the -- you can see the way the St. Louis
14 market evolved. The
sales are kind of clumped in two
15 different areas, then one up north, that's kind of
16 isolated.
17 Now, total capital investment in this market has
18 been about a billion dollars, $800 million on the Missouri
19 side, $200 million on the Illinois side. There's currently
20 about 10,800 gaming positions, 8,300 on the Missouri side
21 or 77 percent, 2,500 on the Illinois side or 23 percent.
22 The two largest casinos in St. Charles and Maryland
23 Heights represent about 62 percent of all the gaming
24 positions in the entire market. So things evolved kind of
25 clumpy. Now, all these
casinos have slot machines and
Page 8
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 table games, but that's pretty much where the similarities
2 end. Harrah's and Ameristar are basically
entertainment
3 complexes. They're very
large, in excess of 120,000
4 square feet of gaming space.
They feature streetscapes,
5 a large amount of amenities.
I think we've got a grand
6 total of ten restaurants between the two casinos. There's
7 a hotel at Harrah's.
The casinos are well-finished, high
8 ceilings, a very enjoyable atmosphere. The cost -- the
9 investment in those two casinos is somewhere around 750,
10 740 million dollars.
You contrast that to the President,
11 the Alton Belle, and the Casino Queen, which currently
12 operate on boat vessels, typically two or three decks, low
13 ceilings, not as high-level finish work, not as many
14 amenities. The
President has one restaurant, very limited
15 parking. The Casino
Queen has two restaurants. They do
16 feature a nice surface parking lot, and they do have a 150
17 room hotel. Up north
the Alton Belle is the smallest
18 casino, 23,000 square feet, probably a fifth of the size
19 of either Ameristar or Harrah's. They've got two nice
20 restaurants. You know,
it's a fairly nice facility,
21 pretty good level of finish work with regard to the Alton
22 Belle.
23 So
when you step back and look at the market in
24 terms of customer convenience, there's really only one
25 location if you want to go to one of the nicer
Page 9
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 entertainment complexes.
2 MR. MULLALLY:
This was really by design.
3 If you look at the Commission's mission statement, it
4 is -- just to repeat it, to serve the citizens of Missouri
5 by ensuring integrity of charitable and commercial gaming,
6 that's our enforcement investigative side, and by
7 optimizing its social and economic impact on the state.
8 And the purpose of that is that if this is something that
9 the people of the State of Missouri want, as they have
10 reflected by a number of votes, some in the neighborhood
11 of 60 percent of the people have continuously said they
12 want this product to be offered to them. If that is going
13 to be the case, we had tried to, through the regulatory
14 licensing process, to encourage facilities that are what I
15 call entertainment facilities rather than just gambling
16 joints. It's the
difference between, I guess what you call
17 gaming versus gambling.
You can do one of two ways.
18 Either you can slap a make shift building down there and
19 put a bunch of slot machines and table games in there and
20 people can just go there to gamble, or you can have, as Jim
21 just described and what we have certainly in our
22 metropolitan market, full scale entertainment complexes
23 that have a lot of nongaming opportunities. And then I
24 think what you have is a product that is much more like
25 entertainment. And I
think those things tend to
Page 10
Concannon & Jaeger
St. Louis, Missouri (314)
421-1000
1 minimize -- I'm not saying they eliminate. They tend to
2 minimize the gambling problems that you have, I think.
3 MR. OBERKIRSCH:
Right. And the Missouri
4 constitution allows gaming on the Missouri River and
5 Mississippi River. And
you can see in the St. Louis
6 market that there's quite a bit of shoreline in this
7 market. The Missouri comes in through here, goes up
north
8 into Alton. And the
Mississippi River, you know, it
9 spans the entire length of the metropolitan area. So
10 there's a lot of unused shoreline with regard to gaming
11 potential.
12 MR. MULLALLY:
Are those trees in the way?
13 Can you see the screen okay?
14 COMMISSIONER GANT: Not yet.
15 MR.
OBERKIRSCH: This next slide kind of
16 highlights the population in the St. Louis metropolitan
17 area. Currently 1.8
million adults, 1.4 million or 77
18 percent on the Missouri side and 400,000 or 23 percent on
19 the Illinois side. As
you can see, there's some --
20 there's various highly-populated regions that --
21 particularly to the south that are unserved by a casino to
22 date.
23 Let's take a look at the market in terms of gaming
24 revenue. Currently
generates for fiscal year 2003 $827
25 million, $553 million or 67 percent on the Missouri side,
Page 11
Concannon & Jaeger St. Louis, Missouri (314) 421-1000
1 $274 million or 33 percent on the Illinois side. Now, keep
2 in mind from the
previous slide that the distribution of
3 population was 77 percent on the Missouri side versus 23
4 percent on the Illinois side.
So immediately you can see
5 inequity between the population base and the amount of
6 revenue in Missouri, that Missouri is getting. And I went
7 ahead and ran the numbers.
If you evenly apportioned
8 gaming revenue against the population base, Missouri would
9 have an additional $84 million. That would equate to $24
10 million in taxes. One
of the obvious reasons -- actually
11 I wanted to point out a couple more statistics. If you
12 apportioned the gaming revenue against capital investment
13 in the market the result would be even more dramatic.
14 Missouri should get about another $125 million in gaming
15 revenue. And if you
apportioned it against size -- the
16 size of the casinos, Missouri should be getting about $157
17 million more in gaming revenue. So the question is why
18 does the inequity exist?
Part of it is definitely due to
19 the loss limit
that Illinois does not have to contend
20 with. But another part
of it has to do with the location
21 of Missouri's high end casinos. They're not right on the
22 border between Missouri and Illinois. They're offset into
23 the suburbs. So for
residents living in Belleville,